Virtual Labs

Tools

Aim

Theory

Pretest

Procedure

Simulation

Posttest

References

Contributors

Feedback

Aim

Theory

Pretest

Procedure

Simulation

Posttest

References

Contributors

Feedback

Control design via pole placement for pendulum on cart with Pre-compensator design

Choose difficulty:

Beginner

Intermediate

Advanced

Q1. Which of the following method is not used to design state feedback controller?

a: Direct substitution method Explanation

Explanation

b: Transformation method Explanation

Explanation

c: Ackermann’s method Explanation

Explanation

d: All of the above Explanation

Explanation

Q2. What is the necessary condition for pole placement using state feedback design?

a: All poles must be lies on the left half of the s plane Explanation

Explanation

b: System should be controllable Explanation

Explanation

c: System should be observable Explanation

Explanation

d: Rank of the controllability matrix should be less than the order of the system Explanation

Explanation

Q3. What is the assumption considered to design state feedback control?

a: System should be controllable Explanation

Explanation

b: System should be observable Explanation

Explanation

c: All states are measurable Explanation

Explanation

d: All poles must be lies on the left half of the s plane Explanation

Explanation

Q4. What is the design goal of the state feedback control?

a: To improve transient response Explanation

Explanation

b: To cancel the steady state error Explanation

Explanation

c: To measure all state variable Explanation

Explanation

d: None of the above Explanation

Explanation

Q5. What is the design goal of the pre-compensator?

a: To improve transient response Explanation

Explanation

b: To cancel the steady state error Explanation

Explanation

c: To measure all state variable Explanation

Explanation

d: None of the above Explanation

Explanation

Community Links Sakshat Portal Outreach Portal FAQ: Virtual Labs

AGPL 3.0 & Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)