Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM), Pulse Width Modulation (PWM), Pulse Position Modulation(PPM), Pulse Coded Modulation & their Demodulation
1. In Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM), what is a critical trade-off encountered when increasing the signal bandwidth to mitigate inter-symbol interference (ISI)?
2. In high-frequency switching applications, what makes Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) inherently less power-efficient compared to other modulation schemes?
3. In Pulse Code Modulation (PCM), how does increasing the number of bits per sample impact both the bandwidth requirement and the Signal-to-Quantization-Noise Ratio (SQNR)?
4. In Pulse Position Modulation (PPM), how does timing jitter specifically impact the symbol detection process in a non-ideal receiver?
5. In PCM, why is there a practical limit to increasing quantization levels beyond a certain point, even if bit rate is not a constraint?
6. What is the primary non-ideality introduced by a nonlinear modulator in a PAM system from a frequency domain perspective?
7. Why is Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) more suitable for motor control applications compared to PAM?
8. In a noisy communication channel, which modulation scheme among PAM, PWM, PPM, and PCM is most susceptible to amplitude noise and why?
9. In a PCM system, undersampling a band-limited signal results in which primary artifact, and how does it manifest in the frequency domain?
10. In high-speed PPM systems, what is a key reason for preferring higher-order modulation despite its susceptibility to timing jitter?